INDIANAPOLIS – Trailing in the polls, Congressman Todd Young is resorting to Washington, D.C. political tactics and attacking his likely opponent.
WRTV: “Indiana’s U.S. Senate race has taken on a nasty tone with just four months to go before the election.”
“…His campaign immediately took a negative tone after former Senator Evan Bayh announced his candidacy – attacking Bayh’s character and residency.”
Indiana Public Media: “Todd Young Criticizes New Senate Opponent..”
The strategy is the Congressman’s best option, given that his own record is so out-of-touch with Hoosiers. He’s voted 96% of the time with DC Republicans, supported the effort to shutdown the government, threatened the healthcare of Hoosiers, and supported privatizing Social Security while turning Medicare into a voucher program.
Hoosiers are tired of the negativity coming from Washington and from Congressman Todd Young. That is not Hoosier Commonsense – it’s a damaging ideology by Young.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: TODD YOUNG IN LOCKSTEP WITH THE OUT-OF-TOUCH REPUBLICAN PARTY
YOUNG VOTED FIVE TIMES TO SHUT DOWN THE GOVERNMENT OVER THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT
9/20/13: House Republicans Passed A Bill To Fund The Government That Would Defund The Affordable Care Act, Even Though They Knew It Would Be Vetoed.“Sept. 20: With a potential government shutdown 11 days off, the Republican-run House ignores a White House veto threat and uses a near party-line 230-189 vote to approve legislation denying money for much of the health care law while keeping the government open through Dec. 15. The measure moves to the Democratic-led Senate.” [Politico,10/1/13]
9/29/13: House Republicans Passed Bills To Fund The Government That Would Delay Implementation Of The Affordable Care Act By A Year, And Repeal The Medical Device Tax. “Sept. 29: Just after midnight on Sunday morning, the House uses a rare and lengthy weekend session to shift its demands for restricting Obamacare. By a near party-line 231-192 vote, the House votes to delay implementation of the health care law by a year. It also votes 248-174 to repeal a tax on many medical devices that helps pay for the health care overhaul. The votes send the revamped shutdown bill back to the Senate.” [Politico,10/1/13]
YOUNG VOTED FOR THE FY 2013 RYAN BUDGET
Young Voted For House Republican Budget For FY 2013. In March 2012, Young voted for: “Adoption of the concurrent resolution that would provide $2.793 trillion in new budget authority for fiscal 2013, not including off-budget accounts. It calls for limiting discretionary appropriations to $1.028 trillion in 2013 and for major cuts in non-defense discretionary and mandatory spending over the next 10 years. It would assume significant future savings by restructuring Medicare into a “premium support” system beginning in 2023, converting Medicaid and the food stamp program into block grants to states, and repealing the 2010 health care overhaul. It calls for an overhaul of the tax code, under which the alternative minimum tax would be repealed, the six current individual income tax brackets would be consolidated into two, tax credits and deductions would be eliminated or curtailed, and the corporate tax code modified to reduce the top rate to 25 percent from 35 percent and converted into a “territorial” tax system where U.S. companies would pay tax only on income earned in the United States. It also would direct the Budget Committee to report a bill that would repeal the sequestration of discretionary spending set for January 2013 by the 2011 debt limit law and direct six House committees to find substitute savings from mandatory programs.” The resolution was adopted 228-191. [CQ,3/29/12; H Con Res 112, Vote 151,3/29/12]
FY 2013 RYAN BUDGET WOULD TURN MEDICARE INTO A VOUCHER SYSTEM THAT WOULD LIKELY SHRINK BENEFITS, FORCE SENIORS TO PAY MORE FOR HEALTHCARE
Ryan Budget Would Turn Medicare Into A Voucher Program. “Under the Ryan plan, spending would be cut $5.3 trillion below President Obama’s budget through 2022. Medicare would be reduced by $205 billion. […] Medicare would be turned into a subsidized set of private insurance plans, with the option of buying into the existing fee-for-service program. The annual growth of those subsidies would be capped just above economic growth, well below the current health care inflation rate.” [New York Times,3/29/12]
2012: Young Voted Against The FY 2013 Democratic Budget, Which Stated That Social Security Privatization Should Be Rejected. In March 2012, Young voted to oppose preventing social security privatization as part of the Democrats’ proposed budget resolution covering FY 2013 to 2022. According the text of the budget resolution, “It is the policy of this resolution that Social Security should be strengthened for its own sake and not to achieve deficit reduction. Because privatization proposals are fiscally irresponsible and would put the retirement security of seniors at risk, any Social Security reform legislation shall reject partial or complete privatization of the program. ” The vote was on an amendment to the House budget resolution replacing the entire budget with the House Democrats’ proposed budget; the amendment failed by a vote of 166 to 259. [House Vote 150,3/29/12; House Budget Committee Democrats,4/15/11]
2012: Young Voted Against Stating That Congress Should Not Privatize Social Security.In March 2012, Young voted against an amendment that would have, according to Congressional Quarterly, “add[ed] ‘sense of the House’ language stating that ‘Social Security privatization is fiscally irresponsible and would put the retirement security of seniors at risk, and that any Social Security reform legislation shall reject partial or complete privatization of the program that includes private accounts funded by current payroll taxes.’ It would [have] amend[ed] the committee report to reflect the policy assumption that the resolution assumes ‘any Social Security reform legislation rejects privatization proposals, because the diversion of payroll contributions and reliance on the financial markets undermines the federal budget and the social safety net.’” The underlying legislation was the FY 2013 House Budget resolution, sponsored by Rep. Paul Ryan. The vote was on the amendment. The House Budget committee rejected the amendment by a vote of 15 to 21. [Congressional Quarterly,3/21/12; Congressional Actions,H. Con. Res. 112]